With all the Climate Change conference stuff I thought I would put down some of my thoughts. Some may call me a 'sceptic', I do think the climate is changing, as it always has. There may even be some effect due to human activity, but all the stuff around it.
With parts of Gosport below sea level (6 feet I understand) though there seems to be a lot less flooding in parts of Gosport compared to when I was young, this may be due to raising the ground level such as at Priddys Hard and perhaps Forton Rec (now seems to be called Forton Park). It may be due to all the work at the sea walls at Stokes Bay, Lee-on-the-Solent and the Ferry Gardens, it has had other names, but I am sure that this is the one most people who have spent some time in Gosport will know it by that name. If Climate change was to cause sea level rise Gosport would notice.
I do agree that better use of resources should be made, but why waste all the time talking and making agreements that can never be enforced on countries, though I am sure some Governments will use the excuse of these agreements to make rules, laws and controls on some of their population. If the human factor is a problem why have a meeting where 35,000 delegates attend, plus all the others that will go to report, deal with security an so on.
I have looked at a number of Carbon Footprint calculation web sites, put in my details and the results were in the range of just over 10% to just over 50% of the UK average, so how useful are they? I never learnt to drive so do not own a car, I use a wood fired stove to run my central heating and some of my winter water heating. I bought my first energy saving bulb around 20 years ago, and now have a selection of different types from the straight 40w bulbs through to bulbs made up of a number of LEDs, you can see the earlier item for details. I have also planted 10 semi-dwarfing fruit trees in my garden. So I hope the negative I put below, does not mean you will think, I will not do what I can, in particular if it may save me some money in the long term.
I do get annoyed when the Council will not collect some waste for recycling that I feel should be able to be, such as batteries and 'tin' foil. The Guides at the Salvation Army used to collect it for Guide Dogs for the Blind, 'creating the joke,'blind dogs for the Guides'. I am sure there are good reasons, but feel the aim is to make the recycling system as complicated as possible so if the recycling rates are low it is the householder fault. Where they change the rules to make it easier, they reduce the items that can be recycled. I am sure there are good reasons, but it strikes me that they do not think of the problems and pasts of householders. I am sure many families have the problem of getting all the members of the family to put the items in the correct bin or are able to control what is put from the pavement. Also I do gardening for mostly retired people, 4 in their 90's and most of the rest in their 80's. One lady sorted all the different items, eg paper, tins, plastic in different bags and ended with a label on the bin about mixed waste. She was upset and said, that she won't sort it out for them'. Which is what they want, but all they saw was bags in the recycle bin and did not use their brain to see what had happened.
I feel rather than spending large amounts working out what may happen to the climate or having meetings to work out what limits should be put on. The problem to my mind will be a shortage of resources as the increasing population of the World becomes better off (or better off in relation to the UK), the UK needs to work out what it will need to do produce the energy, or reduce the energy required to the amount that it will be able to afford to import. The economy could be improved to bring in more, apart from the fact that UK Governments love wasting our money, no not by on public spending as much of that goes back in to the UK economy, but by giving it to other countries in the form of financial speculation, falling out of the ERM in the Conservatives case or selling half the UKs gold reserves at $240 an ounce, now at up to $1,200 an ounce in real terms 3-4 time as much. Yes they did sell the 3G mobile licences for £22 billion but of course to UK mobile companies, so they could not afford to build the masts. It was OK though as overseas mobile companies could buy up he UK companies at less than they paid for the licences and were allowed to share the cost of building the masts. So they have done what the UK well English Governments in the later years have done what they have done since the early 20th centenary, make the UK/ England worse off to the benefit of other countries. If it was to the less well off countries I could not complain as many people do give to those countries. Yes £800 million over 10 years to assist regarding climate change, but billions doing all sorts of things to much better off countries over the last 100 years. I have a list, but am sure you could come up with with some.
This will only work if help is arranged to fund energy and resource conservation also UK energy production, not based on a current cost benefit but based in the future. If not when the time comes the Government will have to deicide if it will ration to those who need or to those who can pay. It will mean 70's power cuts. Just think how much could be done back then with no electricity and what could be done now. I feel they have no belief that energy use will be reduced, so when it all goes wrong future Governments will say it was because, 'no one saved the energy in the past'. Governments always blame everyone, even when a proportion of the population is the problem. I feel Tony Blair was most guilty of this, like a teacher holding the whole class to detention because of the actions of a few in the class. I will stop there, but will drop other similar items in the blog, more or less, depending on your thoughts.
I feel the 'Global Warming - Climate Change' thing is just a smoke screen to hid what should be done. Mind you it does give the TV and radio something to make programmes about, though if they say anything against Global Warming all hell breaks out. Ian